OHCHR / US UNIVERSITIES PROTESTS

Commenting on law enforcement actions against protesters at universities in the United States, UN Human Rights Office Spokesperson Marta Hurtado said, “freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly are fundamental to society – particularly when there is sharp disagreement on major issues, as there are in relation to the conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel.” OHCHR
d3202427
Video Length
00:02:12
Production Date
Asset Language
Geographic Subject
MAMS Id
3202427
Parent Id
3202427
Alternate Title
unifeed240430f
Description

STORY: OHCHR / US UNIVERSITIES PROTESTS
TRT: 02:12
SOURCE: OHCHR
RESTRICTIONS: NONE
LANGUAGE: ENGLISH / NATS

DATELINE: 30 APRIL 2024 GENEVA, SWITZERLAND

View moreView less
Shotlist

1. Various shots, Palais Wilson
2. SOUNDBITE (English) Marta Hurtado, Spokesperson, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR):
“We are troubled by a series of heavy-handed steps taken to disperse and dismantle protests across university campuses in the United States of America. Freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly are fundamental to society – particularly when there is sharp disagreement on major issues, as there are in relation to the conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel. Actions taken by university authorities and law enforcement officials to restrict such expression need to be carefully scrutinised, to ensure such measures go no further than what is demonstrably necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of others, or for another legitimate aim such as maintenance of public health or order. We are concerned that some of law enforcement actions across a series of universities appear disproportionate in their impacts. Antisemitic conduct and speech were totally unacceptable and deeply disturbing. Anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian conduct and speech were equally reprehensible. Incitement to violence or hatred on grounds of identity or viewpoints – whether real or assumed - must be strongly repudiated. We have already seen such dangerous rhetoric can quickly lead to real violence. Such conduct can, and must be, addressed individually, rather than through sweeping measures that impute to all members of a protest the unacceptable viewpoints of a few. Here, as elsewhere, responses by universities and law enforcement need to be guided by human rights law, allowing vibrant debate, and protecting safe spaces for all. US universities have a strong, historic tradition of student activism, strident debate and freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. It must be clear that legitimate exercises of the freedom of expression cannot be conflated with incitement to violence and hatred.”

View moreView less
Storyline

Commenting on law enforcement actions against protesters at universities in the United States, UN Human Rights Office Spokesperson Marta Hurtado said, “freedom of expression and the right to peaceful assembly are fundamental to society – particularly when there is sharp disagreement on major issues, as there are in relation to the conflict in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Israel.”

“UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk on Tuesday said he was troubled by a series of heavy-handed steps taken to disperse and dismantle protests across university campuses in the United States of America,” she said.

In recent weeks, thousands of US university students have been protesting against the war in Gaza. Large-scale demonstrations have also taken place on campuses in other countries in recent days. Many of the protests have been held without incident and continue. At a number of locations, however, protests have been dispersed or dismantled by security forces. Hundreds of students have been arrested. Many have subsequently been released, while others still face charges or academic sanctions.

“Actions taken by university authorities and law enforcement officials to restrict such expression need to be carefully scrutinized, to ensure such measures go no further than what is demonstrably necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of others, or for another legitimate aim such as maintenance of public health or order. We are concerned that some of law enforcement actions across a series of universities appear disproportionate in their impacts,” Hurtado said.

“Antisemitic conduct and speech were totally unacceptable and deeply disturbing. Anti-Arab and anti-Palestinian conduct and speech were equally reprehensible,” the spokesperson said.

Adding “Incitement to violence or hatred on grounds of identity or viewpoints – whether real or assumed - must be strongly repudiated. We have already seen such dangerous rhetoric can quickly lead to real violence.”

“Such conduct can, and must be, addressed individually, rather than through sweeping measures that impute to all members of a protest the unacceptable viewpoints of a few. Here, as elsewhere, responses by universities and law enforcement need to be guided by human rights law, allowing vibrant debate and protecting safe spaces for all,” Hurtado stated.

The Office of the High Commissioner stressed that any restrictions to freedom of expression and right to peaceful assembly must be strictly guided by the principles of legality, necessity and proportionality. These standards must also be applied without discrimination.

“US universities have a strong, historic tradition of student activism, strident debate and freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. It must be clear that legitimate exercises of the freedom of expression cannot be conflated with incitement to violence and hatred,” she said.

View moreView less

Download

You need to first accept the terms and conditions before download.

Type Language Format Size
Video Original HD PAL 297311.00 Download
Video Original HD NTSC 298322.00 Download
Video Original SD PAL 298409.00 Download